Measure Theory

Definition

For the following we first denote that
Ek increases to E means EkEk+1 and E=k=1Ek which we write as
EkearrowE
Ek decreases to E means Ek+1Ek and E=k=1Ek which we write as
EkE

Corollary

(continuity of measure) Suppose E1,E2... are measurable subsets of Rd.
(i) If EkearrowE or
(ii) If EkE and m(Ek)< for some k
Then:

m(E)=limnm(En)

Proof. For (i) Construct disjoint measurable subsets Gk=EkEk1. Then we have by countable additivity

m(E)=limnm(k=1NGk)=limnk=1Nm(Gk)

For (ii) Construct disjoint sets Gk=EkEk1 for each k. Because every subsequent Ek is a subset of En

k=nEk=Ek=E

which is the set common between all subsequent subsets and En and by countable additivity

m(k=nGk)=k=nm(Gk)

which is the set difference of all subsequent subsets with En Putting everything together we have

m(En)=m(E)+m(k=nGk)

(S) Since there exists some n where m(En) as assumed in the proposition this implies:

  1. by monotonicy we have m(E)<m(En)
  2. m(k=nGk) converges for that n to some finite value. Hence it is clear from
k=nm(Gk)=k=1m(Gk)k=1nm(Gk)

that k=nGk converges since all terms on both RHS and LHS here must be finite. Thus there exists an N in which for all n>N,

k=nm(Gk)=k=1m(Gk)k=1nm(Gk)ε

Taking limits on all sides of (1):

limnm(En)=limnm(E)+limnk=nm(Gk)=m(E)+0